On 22.12.2011 13:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On 12/22/2011 01:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> fact is that messages most time are ignored / not seen by many >> maintainers which is my only explanation for messages like >> this "[/etc/rc.d/init.d/asterisk:9] PID file not absolute. Ignoring." >> >> if systemd would refuse to start in such cases and write a clear > Well, maybe not refuse to start, but refuse to load this unit
what is finally the same, a not loaded unit will not start if there is not a strange bug :-) however, maintainers should be forced to make their packages clean to solve problems before they get critical sometimes later, in a perfect world they would test their packages and read logs, but we do not live in a perfect world :-(
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
