On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> Lennart, Kay: I hate you damn it! :-D I have nothing against you beside that you talk total nonsense below. :) > Man, how can a fstab file be so complex to justify it? It's simpler > than the service files we already load. Now to simply parse /etc/fstab > we need to call a generator, that parses (was being done already), > generates a new file, that triggers inotify, that calls systemd, that > parses it again. Ouch, that's cumbersome at least, slow at last! Inotify? Calls systemd? Parses again? Dome already? In the above paragraph almost all wrong. > One suggestion at IRC was to just keep systemd mount units. But if we > should go this route, then we should call to deprecate /etc/fstab. > Last time we discussed about it, people said it was not going to > happen since some tools were parsing and relying on it. Whats is the > way to go? > > The only way I thing this is sane is if we call to deprecate > /etc/fstab. Otherwise it's total bs :-P > > PS: please stop increasing my pid count... you know I hate it! > PS2: ls /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-* && crie out loud! I ignored the rest of it, it would not have ended good for you if I continued to comment. :) Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel