On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Peeters Simon <peeters.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/6/18 Léo Gillot-Lamure <leo.gil...@navaati.net>: >> Hello. >> >> I'm trying to get systemd work as the user session supervisor, thus i >> want it to launch the dbus daemon for the session. Systemd seems to >> require that dbus is socket activated (service units of Type=dbus have a >> Require dep on dbus.socket, not on dbus.service), so i created the >> relevant .socket and .service unit files. Taking inspiration from the >> unit files at the system level, i put "/usr/bin/dbus-daemon --session >> --address=systemd: --nofork --systemd-activation" as the ExecStart >> command line for the daemon. The session boots up, the dbus daemon is >> launched by the socket activation, the gnome panel is properly launched >> (trough a unit file) and registers to the bus, messages on the bus are >> correctly passed, everything seems fine. >> Except the bus-activation of services. For example launching >> gnome-terminal doesn't work because it tries to launch something (can't >> remember what, maybe it was gconf, or some gvfs stuff) using the bus and >> it fails. The result is exactly the same when not using the >> --systemd-activation flag. This message >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-May/005301.html >> says that it's a dbus bug, because the daemon launches bus-activated >> processes with DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS==systemd:,guid=<hash> which is >> broken. >> >> Thus arise two questions : >> - Auke, considering this problem how did you manage to get the >> session-wide DBus work in your Meego systemd --user experiment ? >> - Dear DBus folks, could this bug be fixed ? Maybe there are already >> patches around fixing it ? I could not see any mention of it on the >> mailing list. > > link to the bug (and patch) is > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50962 > > the last version of the patch is functionnally correct, but i still > have to clean up some things (or maybe somebody else can) before it > can get in, unfortunatly i am now studying for my exams, so a next > patch will take at least another week. > > also i have been running the patch succesfully (both in system mode > and in my systemd-gnome-session (which i will share soon)) for a while > now (read: since last week) without any problem.
ah nice! is that on systemd HEAD? Love to see the code :^) Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
