On Tue, 19.06.12 23:40, Alexander E. Patrakov (patra...@gmail.com) wrote: > IMHO there is one "issue" with the inetd-style approach: it is > explicitly discouraged in "man sshd". It may well be the case of > outdated documentation, as I don't see any of the indicated problems > on my desktop or laptop. Still, it would be nice to clarify this > discrepancy in the unit file.
I think this is mostly out of date information on today's machines. Starting a per-connection instance is hardly distuingishable from single-instance sshd latency-wise, at least on my machines here. (I mean, I'd be happy if somebody would make sshd single-instance socket activatable, but I think the inetd-style activation is pretty OK performance wise and Apple ships SSH like this too, so I don't see why we shouldn't). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
