On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > regarding the whole discussion on minimal builds and people wanting to > pick specific parts of the systemd build leaving out others, beyond what > the configure switches offer: Here are some guidelines how we recommend > people to do this: > > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/MinimalBuilds > > From our side this should be enough to settle the discussion.
Would an extremely minimal patch (just to configure.ac, not touching any of the pkg-config dependencies, but only intltool, libcap, and gperf), allowing them to be made optional, be acceptable to systemd? It's a tiny subset of this patch: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-June/005407.html which wouldn't touch most of the --with-dbusXdir or --with-pamlibdir args either. (The absence of dbus can actually be worked around today by setting stuff like DBUS_CFLAGS=" " DBUS_LIBS=" " in the configure environment.) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
