'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 29/06/12 23:48 did gyre and gimble: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 27/06/12 21:38 did gyre and gimble: >>> On Wed, 27.06.12 14:56, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote: >>> >>>> The service is systemd-udev.service, not systemd-udevd.service. >>> >>> Applied, thanks! >> >> Why isn't it called systemd-udevd.service? It would be more consistent >> with the others (systemd-logind.service, systemd-journald.service, >> systemd-localed.service etc.) > > Sound good to me to rename it to *d.
I've done this in my tree. Quick question... which of the systemd-udev* units should be renamed? Obviously systemd-udev.service, but what about systemd-udev-control.socket and systemd-udev-kernel.socket which are really sockets relating quite strongly to the daemon so perhaps should follow suit? And finally systemd-udev-settle.service and systemd-udev-trigger.service. These (to me) feel like they should remain as they currently are. Let me know and I'll finish off the patch. Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel