On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Paul Menzel <paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2012, 00:55 +0200 schrieb Kay Sievers: >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: >> >> I'm also generally skeptical of After= without a corresponding >> >> Requires= entry because it only affects the ordering if the other unit >> >> is already present in the working set of services then being started. >> > >> > I did not get that. The manuals are waiting for me. >> > >> >> If something's required to happen before a unit, you need both. >> > >> > Understood. >> >> $ man systemd.unit >> >> "Before=, After= >> Configures ordering dependencies between units. If a unit foo.service >> contains a setting Before=bar.service and both units are being >> started, bar.service's start-up is delayed until foo.service is >> started up. > > So »started up« does not mean is started up and finished with execution?
That's unrelated to the Before= After= ordering. It depends on the Type= of service when systemd gets told/recognizes/marks a service as 'ready'. Man systemd.service. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
