On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:19:01AM -0400, Dmitry Golubovsky wrote: >> Buildroot's toolchain by default provides runtime environment based on >> uclibc [2] which lacks certain functionality systemd depends upon, so >> I had to develop some workarounds. In particular, functions like >> execvpe, posix_fallocate, mkostemp, and %ms format are not >> implemented. >> > >> These patches are applicable against the v186 snapshot. >> >> I would like to hear from the systemd dev team whether there is an >> interest in uclibc integration; we can work together on finalizing >> these patches. If there is no such interest, patches will remain with >> Buildroot as they currently are. > > Wouldn't it be better (and beneficial to others) to implement missing > functionality in uclibc?
Looks like. All of these functions seem generally useful and should not be worked around in user code which relies on them. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
