El 18/07/12 07:31, Lucas De Marchi escribió: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>> Hmm, so I am not completely opposed to this (though I also don't see the >>> big benefit). But before we merge anything like this: I think the >>> externally visible headers (i.e. the ones above) should really continue >>> to use the classic #ifdef guards. For the externally used headers we >>> should try hard to make them as "compatible" as we can. That includes >>> the C++ external foo, but also not using any fancy C99 features or >>> #pragmas. >>> >>> Kay, Michal, do you have any strong opinion on this? >> >> I don't care much. >> >> But I like the "experiment", it looks like a nice way doing that. >> Sounds fine to me to try with all the internal stuff, but not the >> libs. > > I'd like to see this experiment, too. I'll probably do that to kmod > and see what happens.
Nothing will happend, systemd is linux-only software and gcc, clang etc all support this feature. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
