On Wed, 08.08.12 19:06, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
> <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 06.08.12 11:43, shawn (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> - case '?':
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> default:
> >> - log_error("Unknown option code %c", c);
> >> + log_error("Unknown option code '%c'", c);
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >
> > Hmm, but this would result in one message by getopt() itself and one by
> > us in case the user uses an unknown switch, no?
> >
> > I'd like to turn off that getopt() internal message, but I am not sure
> > there is a way....
>
> leading : in optstring?
Nah, that just changes whether '?' is returned as error char.
But apparently "opterr = 0" has the desired effect. We probably should
use that in all our tools that use getopt...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
