On Sat, 11.08.12 15:22, Shawn Landden ([email protected]) wrote: > From: Shawn Landen <[email protected]> > > unlike symlink_or_copy_atomic(), this function creates a symlink even if the > oldname and newname (from and to) are on differn't > devices. (stat.st_dev)
Hmm, I am not sure I get this patch. Removing the "copy" bit from symlink_or_copy_atomic() also makes the "atomic" bit of it unnecessary, since creating symlinks is atomic anyway. Hence: why not invoke symlink() directly? (Sorry for the late review...) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
