On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think the desktop guys want any kind of authentication when > the lid is closed. How feasible would it be to do the suspend when the > inhibit is removed? I guess then it puts logind into a "active but > will suspend asap" state which might be difficult to handle. As I said on irc, the user experience I envision in this case is: - user closes lid - polkit dialog is shown (not useful because the lid is closed) - we beep a few times to cause the user to open the lid and see the dialog - if the lid is not opened, we forcefully suspend after a few seconds A similar situation where we can't wait for a policykit dialog to be answered is emergency shutdown when the battery runs empty. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
