'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 18/10/12 23:56 did gyre and gimble: > A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a > single unit with multiple names. > > The idea is to simplify things for the user: only one swap unit per > swap area. It shouldn't matter whether the swap area was activated by > systemd or by direct swapon invocation. The kernel name (from > /proc/swaps) is preferred, but if swap is configured through a unit > file and not active, that name will be used instead. > > The case where a swap unit refers (What=) to a symlink should behave > better than before. > > Note: this patch is goes on top of some cleanup patches that are > pretty boring and thus I'm not posting them, so it might not apply > cleanly. > > --- > Hi, > another RFC. Comments appreciated. > > I think that this change will simplify swap unit handling. I've been > running with it for some time, and things seem to work. Systemclt > output is definitely simpler: just one line.
I've not reviewed the patch, but I figured it would be worth highlighting Olivier Brunel's patch from the 13th October "[PATCH] Fix starting swap unit on symlink made it unstoppable". I presume your patch would fix this same problem but in a different way? Cheers Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
