On Tue, 23.10.12 22:14, Ciprian Dorin Craciun (ciprian.crac...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Why? Why would anybody want to use the journal but not systemd? People > > who have issues with the latter usually are not rational about these > > things, and probably have a more philosophical/religious issue with > > systemd, but then will also have the issues with the journal since it > > follows the same philosophy and thinking. > > Ok. Just to state my bias: I'm currently neutral in the SysV / BSD > init vs systemd. I **really** do want to get rid of all the Bash-ism > initializing my system (actually I would ban Bash from newer > projects). But this is a totally different topic which has been > discussed on almost all the mailing lists related to Linux that I'm > subscribed to... I am sorry I have to ask, but what's wrong with bash? I mean, it's a shell, but what is worse or better than any other shell about it? What's the benefit of dealing with multiple implementations of a shell? Do you want to waste memory, increase your test matrix, complicate the use, yadda, yadda? I really, really don't buy in this Debian ideology of "bash is bad, but dash is awesome", that's just intense BS. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
