On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Sat, 27.10.12 14:15, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>> That is fine, we need to do this, otherwise 'make distcheck' fails >> with configure and NEWS out-of-sync. It needs to be turned into 196 >> just at the moment 196 is released. > > Uh? 195 is already released, this stuff should not be added to the > CHANGES list for 195, but put into a new section for 196. Right, patching in the released 195 makes no sense. But what I tried to say was: Until 196 is released, we need to start a new section, also called 195, otherwise a 196 would cause a mismatch with configure.ac and distcheck fails. :) Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel