On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
<lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 27.10.12 14:15, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:

>> That is fine, we need to do this, otherwise 'make distcheck' fails
>> with configure and NEWS out-of-sync. It needs to be turned into 196
>> just at the moment 196 is released.
>
> Uh? 195 is already released, this stuff should not be added to the
> CHANGES list for 195, but put into a new section for 196.

Right, patching in the released 195 makes no sense.

But what I tried to say was:
Until 196 is released, we need to start a new section, also called
195, otherwise a 196 would cause a mismatch with configure.ac and
distcheck fails. :)

Kay
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to