On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Dec 17, 2012 12:17 PM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > There's also nice patch bfc850 'Add fallback path when accept4() is >> > not available.' Do we care about kernels < 2.6.28? (This version is >> > according to man accept4(2), patch text mentions different versions.) >> >> What kernel version is needed depends on the architecture. From memory x86 >> requires .32 and ARM .36. > According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647825, even > 3.0 on ia64 was missing the call. So it seems the patch should go in to make > life easier.
If nothing else, it would make kernel bisection easier. Considering how minimal the change would be I'd be in favor of adding a fallback (with a warning). That said, I don't think we should use the eudev patch as-is. A run-time fall-back (possibly together with an addition to missing.h) should be sufficient. Let's hear what Kay has to say... Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
