Am 06.01.2013 00:53, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> * the reboot itself is touching the FS too > > Surely not, as we support the rootfs being read-only. Or maybe I > misunderstood what you meant.
on a running system the rootfs is not readonly so a regulary reboot will happen on a rw mounted rootfs jesus christ, i have disabled on any server fsck after x days or x boots because this will hit you always at the wrong moment after a routine kernel update i decide in my job as admin if the time is right for a fs-check i decide this regulary with "touch /forcefsck; systemctl reboot" i do not like to connect to the vCenter server, hold on the boot in GRUB and add a param becaue it wastes time with no benefit in such cases so what is difficult to understand that it makes not sense to declare ANYTHING of the pre-systemd area as "deperecated" nor that you do not a favour for sysadmins to act this way
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
