On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:11:13 +0100 "Kay Sievers" <k...@vrfy.org> wrote:
> > Because these links make the most sense when we support multiple > drives, and as mentioned above, we don't want to support any kind of > stateful rules anymore. We just do the absolute minimum today, and > that is /dev/cdrom. > > People actually asked to remove /dev/dvd link we created in the > initial code, to not make any promises anymore, and not make it look > like multiple devices are supported: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=19b66dc57cce27175ff421c4c3a37e4a491b9c01 > > Your rules look fine, but we don't want to add them upstream, we just > provide the absolute minimum these days, and people should fix their > apps to query for devices, or add custom (or the distribution does) > rules to support legacy requirements. > > Kay > Well thank you Kay, that clears some things and to be honest it does help, but I still am on the idea the a base static rules for the primary cd/dvd driver should exists, don't think that those rules would screw something up. Thanks! -- Robert Milasan L3 Support Engineer SUSE Linux (http://www.suse.com) email: rmila...@suse.com GPG fingerprint: B6FE F4A8 0FA3 3040 3402 6FE7 2F64 167C 1909 6D1A _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
