Am 13.02.2013 10:29, schrieb Colin Guthrie: >> Hmm, but what happens then if people do run >> >> systemctl enable getty@.service?
In my eyes, doing this always seemed wrong, I wouldn't mind if it returned an error. >> We really need to get the story right on this, I guess, so that >> something useful happens in both cases? > > The same could be said of any templated unit with a WantedBy= section I > guess. > > One idea off the top of my head is to have a NoInstanceAlias= directive, > but adding a new verb here seems fugly. I actually like the idea of adding a DefaultInstace= option to the install section. Instead of fiddling with aliases manually, it could look like this: [Install] WantedBy=getty.target DefaultInstance=tty1 Instead of going to [Install], this could even go to [Unit] and affect start/stop, not just enable. > Perhaps we could abuse the - syntax? > > e.g.: > Alias=-getty.target.wants/getty@tty1.service > WantedBy=getty.target Manually writing an alias here seems redundant - you shouldn't have to write an alias when what you do is pretty much standard.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
