On Wed, 13.02.13 20:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> Actually, the syntax already is _not_ a subset of the shell, and has its > own pecularities. Anyone trying to blindly follow shell rules is going > to be severly bitten anyway. So, why not go a bit further and change > the syntax in a way that is useful for our users? It's certainly true that we are not compatible with shell, and that we aren't even trying to be. But in this regard I see no reason to deviate. But let's take one step back. Can you make a good case why comments should trump continuation lines? To me that doesn't even sound so useful, and it would in fact surprise me if things would work that way... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
