On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Holger Hans Peter Freyther at 18/02/13 18:52 did gyre > and gimble: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:47:44AM -0800, David Strauss wrote: >> >> Dear David, all, >> >> >>> It's possible that a lot of it could also allocate on the stack or use >>> stack-style management of a pool in heap. This is pretty >>> performance-critical code, and we're seeing similar CPU overhead. >> >> I think upstream doesn't care about the CPU overhead of the journald. > > I don't really think that's true. It certainly hasn't been optimized > heavily yet, and more concentration is definitely going into features at > present, but that's not to say that performance isn't a goal in the > completeness of time. Also there will be lots of people for whom this is > more of a priority right now and thus they will be the ones perhaps > contributing the patches to help edge things in that direction :)
It's certainly been on my radar already as a problem for performance numbers... I'd like to see if we can fix this. Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
