On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> IMPORT is used to be called immediately and not be queued up to the >>> end of the rules handling, so that later rules could assume that this >>> rule has finished. PROGRAM would do the same as IMPORT and run >>> immediately, RUN always only happens at the very end, regardless where >>> it shows up in the sequence. >>> >>> Not sure if that matter in any interesting way, but it is surely a >>> different behaviour, and we should check that. >> >> Good point. I suppose it might be possible that later rules depend on >> modules/firmware being loaded, so RUN is probably the wrong choice. >> Any reason the ppdev module was loaded using RUN rather than IMPORT? > > Hmm, there is probably nothing that replies on that stuff. We should > use one of the versions everywhere. But which one? :)
Well, was there a reason why the modules were loaded in 80-drivers.rules and not 99-drivers.rules? If not, I guess we could rename it an use RUN, otherwise I suppose we'd have to stick with IMPORT... Anyone else have an opinion? -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
