On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 18.03.2013 19:45, schrieb Kay Sievers: >> I put an SSD in that crappy box today; it's down from 25 to 7 sec on >> the otherwise identical system. :) >> >> So I'll not need to debug any rotating media issues, I don't have any >> of them again. :) > > this is nice for you > > but keep in mind that for professional environments for many > years SSD is no option for some TB of data and even if > the price falls down you have to calculate redundancy for > RAID10 environemnts which can not be raplced by a SSD > due lack of relieability and no real-world expierience > how long they run and how you detect errors before it is > too late
I'm of the same mindset. For some time to come, many people will continue to purchase lower end systems without SSD's, and we want to offer them a compelling OS that outperforms the competitors in all aspects, including boot time. So, I consider the bad performance on non-SSD's a bug, and I'm looking at trying to find a solution. Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
