Hi, I would like to bring my discussion back. Any help?
Thanks On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Umut Tezduyar <u...@tezduyar.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What would be the advantage of placing an early boot up script in between > local-fs.target/sysinit.target OR in between sysinit.target/basic.target? > > I cannot decide what should be the ordering for some early initialization > "oneshot" services I have in my embedded system. These services makes some > simple preparations that were previously in /rcS.d/. Dropped support for > /rcS.d/ in systemd was placing these services as After=sysinit.target and > WantedBy=sysinit.target (and I am not entirely sure but possibly > Before=basic.target). I could place them as systemd did before or I could > place them as After=local-fs.target and Before=sysinit.target. > > Since my embedded system doesn't have login prompt, I don't see the > difference between basic.target and sysinit.target other than socket > activation. Even then, a service that is socket activated has > DefaultDependency=yes (It will start after basic.target). > > To summarize, where are users encouraged to place their early boot up > initialization services (ex: setting up the bandwith on a NIC)? > > Thanks >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
