[systemd-devel] isolate and socket activation

[Matthew Monaco]

I noticed that when isolating a target that requires a <unit>.socket, the
<unit>.service which the socket activates will be stopped. Is this intentional?
I expected the service to be left alone (even in the weaker case that the socket
wasn't already active).
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel