On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:05:39AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:11:41AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 13.03.13 10:27, Umut Tezduyar ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > No need to try to stop systemd-sysctl on shutdown as > > > this service doesn't have ExecStop= anyways. > > > > It's kinda nice if all services are gone from the service list when we > > shut down, and doing this costs pretty much nothing. > > > > Also, the patch is incomplete, as shutdown.target is still listed in > > Before=. > > > > Anyway, I fail to see the reason why we would want to apply this patch... > Hi, > I applied the patch, because it simplifies things by a tiny bit, removing > one explicit relationship. But please do revert if what was there before > was better. Ah, already reverted. Nvm.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
