On 03/23/2013 03:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 13.03.13 01:44, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
Attempt to satisfy requirement dependencies retroactively even if
the unexpectedly activated unit would prefer to be started After them.
This way remote-fs-pre.target can be pulled in by performing a manual
mount (the mount units have both Wants= and After=
remote-fs-pre.target).
I am a bit concerned abou this. Wouldn't this also mean that if a mount
for /foobar/waldo suddenly shows up we'd still retroactively mount /foobar too,
if that happens to have a unit file? That sounds wrong, no?
You are right. It would do exactly this wrong thing.
I need to rethink.
Michal
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
