On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Fri, 22.03.13 21:46, Auke-Jan Kok (a...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote: > >> units/u...@.service.in | 10 +++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> New commits: >> commit 3abcb6acedb588ca17f6374c1836f8a58396e520 >> Author: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h....@intel.com> >> Date: Fri Mar 22 21:43:31 2013 -0700 >> >> Update user session unit template. >> >> While most folks will be using the derivative from user-session-units, >> I'm updating this one to reflect some of the fixes and things to note >> about user sessions: >> >> - cgroup should be set with "%u" - username instead of %I >> - set dbus path with %U explicitly too >> - hint to folks that wish to use MEM_CG features in user sessions >> - allow unit to be enabled for instances with systemctl enable > > Hmm, with the old %I wouldn't it suffice to instantiate the unit via > user@USERNAME.service rather than user@UID.service? > > I mean, I am not against this patch, just noticing this...
Right, it will just work regardless now, so, less chance for problems. Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel