On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Lennart Poettering
<lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 22.03.13 21:46, Auke-Jan Kok (a...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
>>  units/u...@.service.in |   10 +++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> New commits:
>> commit 3abcb6acedb588ca17f6374c1836f8a58396e520
>> Author: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h....@intel.com>
>> Date:   Fri Mar 22 21:43:31 2013 -0700
>>
>>     Update user session unit template.
>>
>>     While most folks will be using the derivative from user-session-units,
>>     I'm updating this one to reflect some of the fixes and things to note
>>     about user sessions:
>>
>>     - cgroup should be set with "%u" - username instead of %I
>>     - set dbus path with %U explicitly too
>>     - hint to folks that wish to use MEM_CG features in user sessions
>>     - allow unit to be enabled for instances with systemctl enable
>
> Hmm, with the old %I wouldn't it suffice to instantiate the unit via
> user@USERNAME.service rather than user@UID.service?
>
> I mean, I am not against this patch, just noticing this...

Right, it will just work regardless now, so, less chance for problems.

Auke
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to