On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:22:14AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Cristian Rodríguez > > > El 26/03/13 15:17, Bill Nottingham escribió: > > > Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) said: > > >> --- > > >> TODO | 2 -- > > >> man/systemd.unit.xml.in | 8 ++++++++ > > >> src/core/condition.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > >> src/core/condition.h | 1 + > > >> src/core/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 | 1 + > > >> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Not that this seems wrong, but what is the usage case for this that > > > can't be solved via package (de)installation? > > > > The patch looks fine to me, what it solves ? well.. there may be > > generic image deployments , who contain the same packages but one of > > them is only really useful in arch s390 or ppc.. etc.. > > I think it should be kernel architecture if so, since you might very > well have multiple userland architectures enabled and working at the > same time. (So it should be ConditionKernelArchitecture to make it > clear.) Shouldn't this be a glob, like ConditionHost=?
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
