On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 02.04.2013 01:51, schrieb Tom Gundersen: >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote: >>> simply let "sysctl.conf" ovverride anything of you >>> config pieces, to not spit warnings about it and >>> EVERYBODY is happy >> >> It might be confusing why some of the entries in >> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-defaults.conf do not take effect. A warning seems >> sensible. You can get rid of the warning by putting a (possibly empty) >> file at /etc/sysctl.d/50-defaults.conf which does not contain the >> offending entry > > which does not supress the warnings > > so no - the new logic is even not clear upstream it seems > and that is why sysctl.conf is the way to go to stop more and more > invalidate any written documentation and book for no benfit > > if it exists - ignore "/usr/lib/sysctl.d/" > > [root@rawhide ~]# cat /etc/sysctl.d/50-defaults.conf > [root@rawhide ~]# > > [ 5.666890] systemd-sysctl[214]: Duplicate assignment of kernel/sysrq in > file > '/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf', ignoring. > [ 5.698594] systemd-logind[207]: Watching system buttons on > /dev/input/event0 (Power Button) > [ 5.741690] sdb1: WRITE SAME failed. Manually zeroing. > [ 5.844488] systemd-sysctl[238]: Duplicate assignment of kernel/sysrq in > file > '/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf', ignoring.
My apologies, I intended to write 50-default.conf, not 50-defaults.conf. -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
