Op 6 apr. 2013, om 22:41 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het 
volgende geschreven:

> 
> 
> Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin:
>>> What is "primary arch"?  The arch of init? ls? the package manager?
>> As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every 
>> multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional 
>> arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches and 
>> the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the future, 
>> then ARCH can be list of equal arches.
>> 
>>> usually the kernel ones?
>> Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this system's 
>> own kernel, not arch of current running kernel.
> 
> i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running 
> kernel
> 
> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i
> x86_64

No, run that kernel on a 32bit Atom cpu and it will still return x86_64. I only 
/proc/cpuinfo had a standard layout :(

regards,

Koen
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to