On Wednesday 2013-04-17 16:42, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Wed, 17.04.13 06:58, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@inai.de) wrote: > >Well, the current logic is that we suspend when the lid is >closed,[...] Lid switch inhibitor locks are currently per-VT, i.e. a >lock taken by GNOME is considered irrelevant if you switch away from >GNOME.[...] So in order to make sure the lid switch suspend works >fine even when you happen to switch away from GNOME logind will >handle it then.
That reasoning is perfectly fine; the problem is that logind acts upon a physical lid state change from the distant past. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
