On Thu, 18.04.13 08:46, Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Then, the whole PID file story looks like a mess to me anyway, modern > > daemons should not use PID files anyway... Even more, making them > > configurable sounds really wrong. If this is about allowing > > instantiation, then people can use %i in the PID file name, and be done > > with it, but otherwise this sounds like a completely ridiculous > > configuration option in sysconfig, like the first one to get rid > > of... So the usecase already sounds really wrong to me, to start with. > > > > This really sounds like a bug to me we should close WONTFIX with a nice > > explanation. I know Tom won't like that, but well, sometimes we have to > > say No to wishes. > > > > I know I though different about this in January (and commented so in the > > bug), but in retrospect I must disagree with myself on this... > > fair enough, care to close the bug then?
OK, done! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
