On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Umut Tezduyar <[email protected]> wrote: >> The way I see it is "systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service" is no different than >> "systemd-static-nodes.service" except later is restricted to /dev and runs >> before udev. > > Hm, if we want to take that view, then it might make sense to rename > it systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service (or something like that). I > don't have a strong opinion either way.
Yeah, I think that makes sense. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
