On Fri, 26.04.13 21:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:14:07PM +0200, Daniel Buch wrote: > > I felt the inconsistentsy was kinda awfull. > > > > I can change all to void* (instead of, void *) if you like but else leave > > this patch to the trash? > I think it doesn't matter too much, it can stay as is. I think both "void *p" and "void* p" are fine, with a slight preference for the former. "void*p" and "void * p" suck though... The choice between "void *p" and "void* p" is up to the developers who write the code in question I'd say. We are happy to accept patches with either syntax, and we will not reformat them on commit. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel