On Fri, 14.06.13 14:33, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:03:00AM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > > Hi. > > > > We are converting some daemons to socket activation. Most of them open > > unix sockets and manage incoming connections in a main-loop, so the > > easiest way to convert it is to create Accept=false socket with systemd. > > > > Now, it is quite well described how to start such daemon, however, there > > is little about shutting it down. Should the daemon close(2) the > > received sockets? Should it unlink(2) them from a filesystem? > close() yes, unlink() no. Strictly speaking you don't even have to do that. The kernel will clean up left-over fds when your process exits, hence you don't have to close it explicitly. But you certainly should not unlink() the socket in the fs, because then the socket will not be accessible anymore. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
