Lennart Poettering wrote: > So please, ask the UML guys to somehow cleanup their VT mess. It's their > broken code, and their job to fix it.
The question is how? Just tell me what to do, and I'll do it myself. > I can understand if you are disappointed by this, but please try to see > it from out side: we want clean, supportable code, and we want code that > works correctly. Because, even if we added a work-around to systemd: the > next thing would break soon if you try to run it on UML. Better fix UML > than add work-around to all those projects individually. I'm not disappointed, and there's no need to apologize: I certainly don't want undesirable code going into systemd either. I've already spoken with Al Viro about this, and he has no comments on systemd's behavior [1]. Is there some alternative that I should discuss? [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1525933 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel