On Fri, 26.07.13 00:44, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote: > > 2013/7/25 Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, 22.07.13 05:51, Michael Biebl ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> so it seems to me, we use gettext to translate the PolicyKit policy > >> files, but we do not actually enable/ship them, as the po files are > >> not added to po/LINGUAS. > >> > >> Admittedly, it's currently only a single translation (Polish), so I > >> was wondering what the intention here is. Do we want systemd to be > >> translated? If so, should we reach out to translator get a broader > >> coverage of languages? > > > > Well, I guess translation of the tools and PK policies is probably > > inevitable. We should be careful though, for example, I'd rather not see > > gettext being used within PID 1. > > > > l10n isn't really something I personally care about too much, so we rely > > on community patches to make this work. Patches welcome. > > Apparently we already have a translation, so I was curious, why we > don't ship that in the tarball. > Is that simply an oversight or does it have other reasons?
Oversight. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
