On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:03:31AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 08/21/2013 11:00 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >Hi Zbyszek, > > > >Regarding > ><http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=219061dc524368179b2e65cfe91d4d6b23396ba8>: > > > >Would it make sense to use ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD instead? This > >would match what is done in systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service. The > >effect is currently the same (I think), but might as well be > >consistent in case things change in the future. I don't have too strong of an opinion. Whatever works...
> Adding ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNO to the kmod-static-nodes.service > in the test container I got here running does not trigger > kmod-static-nodes.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=203/EXEC > [FAILED] Failed to start Create list of required static device nodes > for the current kernel. > See 'systemctl status kmod-static-nodes.service' for details. > Unit kmod-static-nodes.service entered failed state. > > Error at bootup. > > So this indeed works to fix that Hm, Jóhann, are you saying that my ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD does not work, or that ConditionVirtualization=!container that I added does not work? Or that it works? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
