Am 11.09.2013 17:08, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> Using FsckPassNo= as a way to add that dep sucks really, because the
> ordering it does is stupid and fsck can do the ordering internally
> anyway these days...

So, shouldn't systemd-fstab-generator omit that entirely, too? Instead,
every mount with pass!=0 should get the correct fsck dependency.

> Automatically adding deps to fsck for all mounts is wrong too, since
> only some block-based file systems need fsck and it would suck having to
> carry a whitelist for thos in systemd.

Fair enough.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to