On Mon, 16.09.13 09:57, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > > On 09/13/2013 08:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 13.09.13 17:49, Gao feng (gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > > > >> Some programs need to set the memory.use_hierarchy(such as libvirt), > >> Add this feature. > > > > Hmm, should this really be an option? Shouldn't we much rather turn this > > on unconditionally if the memory controller is used for a unit? > > > > This appears like an option that would go a way in Tejun's new sane > > cgroup tree logic anyway, no? > > > > So, systemd has no job to deal with memory hierarchy? the kernel will > support memory hierarchy unconditionally? right?
Hmm? What I was suggesting is that memory.use_hierarchy should be the default for systemd, and not configurable by the user, under the assumption that with Tejun's sane_behaviour thing this would become the default anyway? Tejun? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel