On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Sébastien Luttringer <se...@seblu.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote:
>>> Force 0600 and root:root instead, to avoid problems with fat filesystems.
>>
>> Sounds fine to me, to enforce root permissions.
>
> Boot kernel was world readable, and it makes sense. Why making them
> root only readable is a good idea?

Sure, 0644 sounds fine too.

> If your /boot is a FAT filesystem, the world readable rights are
> handled by your mount options.

Right, systemd by default does don't allow to read anything in /boot.
/boot needs to be added to /etc/fstab if it should be readable by
ordinary users.

> On non UEFI systems, world readable rights set by kernel-install matter.

Why would that matter?

>> If people want special permissions, they can always drop-in their own
>> install.d/ callout to mangle them.
> This means maintain it's own generator,

It's not a generator, they are different things in systemd. It would
just be a /usr/lib/kernel/install.d/*.install snippet.

> it's a bit boring for just
> being able to check the size of your installed kernel.

Check the size and file permissions? You don't need access to check
its size, do you?

> The opposite logic seems more appropriate.

0644 sounds good to me too, sure, as long as we have a defined default.

Kay
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to