On 10/10/13 12:38, Carlos Silva wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Tero Roponen <tero.ropo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Testing for y > x is the same as testing for x < y. >> > > >> - if (y > x) >> + if (x > y) >> > <snip> > > I thing you forgot to change the signs ;)
No, I believe that was the point of the patch. The two tests were the same, first testing (x < y), and then (y > x). Now it then properly tests for (x > y) -j > > > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel