On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 22:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 13.10.13 22:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > Humm. So I am very conservative regarding adding vendor specific hacks > to userspace that go that low-level into the system. Given that the > kernel has support for interl rapidstart anyway, why isn't this exposed > properly as a new suspend mode, that we can process like any other of > the existing ones? > > THis really looks like something where the kernel should be fixed first, > and where we then can add support in systemd for, but where we shouldn't > try to work-around incomplete kernel interfaces from userspace...
Nothing to add here. This patch would work right now, and I knew that I could hack systemd's user-space code instead of the kernel PM code :) FWIW, I since found out that the patch I linked to fails, as the glob fails. This is my 1 AM patch: - k = glob(optarg, GLOB_NOSORT|GLOB_BRACE, NULL, &g); + k = glob(path, GLOB_NOSORT|GLOB_BRACE, NULL, &g); Cheers _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
