On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 12:05:23AM +0100, ScotXW wrote: > On 11/01/2013 06:51 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 06:47:00PM +0100, ScotXW wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> systemd is written exclusively for the Linux kernel because this > >> offers advantages over the POSIX API. To illustrate the difference > >> between Linux kernel API and POSIX API I created a diagram, see [1]. > > > > Linux doesn't implement all of the POSIX api in the kernel, other > > portions of it are in other userspace pieces. > > Would you please name a couple beside the libc?
Why, this is your research, not mine :) > > Linux, like all other Unix-like operating systems, also includes some > > apis that are not in POSIX, which is nothing new. > > DRI1? DRI2? What else, what is of advantage to usage on the "typical > home computer"? That sentance doesn't make much sense. > >> On topic: It could be used to illustrate the reasons for this decision. > >> 1. Could you have a look and check whether it is correct? > > > > It isn't. > > Any hints? <snip> This is all _way_ off-topic for this mailing list, sorry. Best of luck with your research. greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel