On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 17:07 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: <snip> > > Systemd should not get any direct or indirect dependency on upower for > > primary service management tasks. It just doesn't sound right to do > > dependencies in this direction. > > That doesn't strike me as as crazy as it may seem. systemd would only > monitor a couple of properties on a remote D-Bus name. If the name isn't > present, use defaults (not on battery, not discharging, HDD spinning).
FWIW, systemd would also need to pull in a dependency on logind. Maybe you're actually asking for UPower to be merged in systemd? That's probably do-able :) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel