On Sun, 03.11.13 10:40, Peter Lemenkov (lemen...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello All! > I'm working on a system service which uses systemd intensively. Right > now it's socket-activated, with main service of type "simple". I > recently added support for querying and publishing some internals via > D-Bus, so it has a D-Bus name now. Does it add anything if I change > type of a main service to "dbus" thus allowing systemd to know for > sure if my service is fully initialized?
Type=notify or Type=dbus are usually the best choices and is what I'd recommend. The former requires you to use sd_notify(), the latter requires you to make your service a bus service. Type=forking is the nastiest choice. Type=simple is an OK choice too, but doesn't pass as much state information to systemd as the other options. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
