On 05/11/13 16:45, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:39 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> Does this not increase the danger that a "make dist" run on a machine
>> without those deps installed would result in a "configure" script that
>> accidentally doesn't have support for those features?
>
> Indeed, it does. But in theory the person rolling the tarball should
> know all of the dependencies.
In theory, nobody needs regression tests, because we all write perfect
code first time. :-)
If you do this sort of conditionalization, I think it's worth ensuring
that "make dist" fails if it would otherwise have produced an incomplete
tarball. gtk-doc.make already has that check (it needs gtk-doc support
*enabled* to make dist) but e.g. gcrypt probably doesn't.
S
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
