On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, salil GK <gksa...@gmail.com> wrote: > 3. One more use case I can think of is - if the process fail to send > heartbeat message ( WATCHDOG ) for some time and later it starts sending - > because of some time. So during the time WATCHDOG notification is missing > process can be marked as failed and the moment notification start coming, > can it be marked as active-running ?
I'm not sure, but this would be easy to test. You could also restart on failed watchdog if you want systemd to react. > 4. Is there way systemd can notify me in case a watchdog timeout happens > for a service - like systemd calls some program or write to some socket etc. > So basically in case any service fails because of watchdog timeout, I would > like to know asynchronously. Is there any way I can configure this. We typically poll systemctl --failed periodically as part of our monitoring. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
