On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog <umut.tezdu...@axis.com> wrote: > Any plans to support existing applications that are making use of thread > level resource management? If not, what are we left with then, posix thread > priorities?
Kay is right; there is no direct replacement. However, it's possible to fork processes on Linux with many of the same properties as threads (shared memory and file descriptors). Originally, all POSIX-like (loosely using "like" here) threads used this capability back with LinuxThreads. Using clone() that way would allow continued use of cgroups resources. Or, perhaps it's a good time to consider a more loosely coupled architecture with multiple processes or daemons. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
